It’s ineffective satire.
Half the people in this thread are defending the author.
The other half is can’t tell whether the author is racist .
It’s not because half the readers don’t recognize satire when they see it.
It’s because there’s nothing in this document to contextualize the author’s baseline position.
Throwing around satirical one-liners on sensitive topics isn’t okay — especially in our current climate.
I get it.
But I don’t accept it.
I do like where it’s heading, though — which is why I made suggestions for improvement.
Because that’s what good editors and good Samaritans do.
Of course, editors and defenders harboring their own unconscious biases wouldn’t have a clue.
What is everyone complaining about?
Don’t they realize it’s satire?
It’s fine the way it is!
That’s exactly what priveleged white people would say.
Thanks for proving the point!